How it works. Arabic builds the future tense by adding ONE thing to a present-tense verb:
In both cases, the verb itself stays in its normal المُضارِع (present-tense) form — endings unchanged: sa-yanjaḥu, sa-tanjaḥu, sa-yanjaḥūna.
More examples from this passage:
How to choose between سَـ and سَوفَ. They mean the same thing; the difference is in feel. سَـ is shorter, lighter, used for any near or likely future. سَوفَ is heavier and adds weight — useful for promises, threats, and formal predictions in essays.
Arabic has TWO kinds of participle (a participle is a word made from a verb that acts like a noun or adjective):
How to form them — Form I (the simplest verbs).
How to form them — Form II to X. Take the المُضارِع (present-tense) form, drop the present-tense subject prefix (ي / ت / أ / ن), and replace it with مُ. Then:
So the SAME verb gives you the active AND the passive participle, with just a vowel difference. The whole story is in that one mark — kasra (i) or fatḥa (a) — under the second-to-last letter.
Why writers use them. Participles are SHORTER than relative clauses. \"The one who writes\" → just al-kātib. \"The thing that is known\" → just al-maʿrūf. One word does the work of three. Journalism leans on them heavily.
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
تَتَوَقَّعُ الإحصائِيَّاتُ — كَما يَذكُرُ النَّصُّ — أن يَصِلَ عَدَدُ المُستَخدِمينَ العَرَبِ لِشَبَكاتِ التَّواصُلِ الاجتِماعيِّ إلى نَحوِ سِتِّمِئَةِ مَليونِ مُستَخدِمٍ قَبلَ نِهايَةِ العَقدِ، أَي ضِعفَ ما كانَ عَلَيهِ في عامِ ألفَين وعِشرينَ، حينَ كانَ يَقتَرِبُ مِن ثَلاثِمِئَةِ مَليونٍ فَقَط. ويَدُلُّ هذا الرَّقمُ على السُّرعَةِ الَّتي تَنتَشِرُ بِها هذِهِ الشَّبَكاتُ بَينَ الجيلِ الجَديدِ، وعلى مَدى تَغَلغُلِها في كُلِّ بَيتٍ.
الشَّواهد: الأَسطُر ١–٣
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
يُمضي سالِم خَمسَ ساعاتٍ على الأقَلِّ أمامَ شاشَةِ هاتِفِهِ يَومِيًّا، وذلِكَ لِأنَّهُ يَستَخدِمُها لِأغراضٍ مُتَعَدِّدَةٍ في الوَقتِ نَفسِهِ: مُتابَعَةُ المُؤَثِّرينَ، ومُشارَكَةُ أخبارِهِ مع أصدِقائِهِ، ومُراقَبَةُ ما يَفعَلونَهُ، وتَعَلُّمُ لُغاتٍ جَديدَةٍ مِن فيديوهاتٍ قَصيرَةٍ. هذِهِ الأنشِطَةُ كُلُّها مُتَرابِطَةٌ في يَومِهِ، فَأصبَحَ يَشعُرُ أنَّهُ لا يَستَطيعُ تَخَيُّلَ حَياتِهِ دونَ هذِهِ الشَّاشَةِ، حتى ولَو لِيَومٍ واحِدٍ فقط.
الشَّواهد: الأَسطُر ٤–٧
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
حَذَّرَتِ الدُّكتورَةُ رَنا مِن خَطَرِ التَّضليلِ المَعلوماتيِّ. فَفي رَأيِها أنَّ الشَّبابَ اليَومَ مُحاطونَ بِكَمِّيَّاتٍ هائِلَةٍ مِن الأخبارِ، بَعضُها صَحيحٌ وبَعضُها مُفَبرَكٌ، ولا يَمتَلِكُ المُستَخدِمُ الصَّغيرُ القُدرَةَ الكافِيَةَ لِيُمَيِّزَ بَينَهُما. وبِذلِكَ يَقَعُ لا مَحالَةَ في فَخِّ تَصديقِ الأخبارِ الكاذِبَةِ، ومُشارَكَتِها مع الآخَرينَ، مِمّا يَزيدُ مِن انتِشارِ التَّضليلِ في المُجتَمَعِ.
الشَّواهد: الأَسطُر ٨–١٠
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
اقتَرَحَتِ الدُّكتورَةُ ثَلاثَ خُطُواتٍ بَسيطَةٍ يُمكِنُ لِأَيِّ شابٍّ تَطبيقُها:
الأُولى: التَّحَقُّقُ مِن المَصدَرِ الأصليِّ لِأَيِّ خَبَرٍ قَبلَ تَصديقِهِ أو إعادَةِ نَشرِهِ.
الثَّانِيَةُ: تَحديدُ وَقتٍ أَقصى لاستِخدامِ الشَّاشَةِ يَومِيًّا، والالتِزامُ بِعَدَمِ تَجاوُزِهِ.
الثَّالِثَةُ: تَجريبُ يَومٍ كامِلٍ في الأُسبوعِ بِدونِ هاتِفٍ، فَإنَّ هذا يُساعِدُ على وُضوحِ التَّفكيرِ وعُمقِ النَّومِ.
الشَّواهد: الأَسطُر ١١–١٥
The article opens with a number and closes with a quote. Paragraph 1 hits you with a startling statistic (300 million Arab users, doubling by the end of the decade). Paragraph 5 hands you a one-line wisdom-saying from Dr Rana (\"the maker of opinion, not its prisoner\"). The whole article is sandwiched between these two attention-grabbers.
Pick the opening number AND the closing quote. What does EACH one do for the reader? Why might the writer have chosen to bookend the article this way, instead of opening or closing with a plain summary?
Top-band answers explain what each bookend does to the reader:
This kind of question — analysing where a writer places things, not just what they say — is exactly what Paper 1 Q4 / Q8 rewards. Bookending and structural choice are top-band moves.
Dr Rana ends with: «مَن سيتعلَّم اليوم كيف يستخدم وسائل التواصل بحكمة، سيصبح غدًا صانعَ رأي، لا أسيرَه» — \"whoever learns today how to use social media wisely will tomorrow be a maker of opinion, not its prisoner\".
Are you a maker of opinion online, or a prisoner of it? Try the one-day-off challenge — leave your phone for a full day this week. What would you notice?
Write two short Arabic sentences in answer: one using سَأَترُكُ (\"I will leave\" — future tense, see Grammar Note 1); one using مُحاط بِـ (\"surrounded by\" — passive participle, see Grammar Note 2).
40–55 minutes for a self-study learner. Can be split into two sessions (read text + vocab + translation in session 1; grammar + questions + craft in session 2).
The learner should already be comfortable with المُضارِع (present tense) — this lesson layers the future on top of it. Lessons 1–5 have surfaced participles in passing (in vocab notes); this is the first lesson where they are taught as a primary structure. Knowing how vowel-marks (kasra / fatḥa) sit on the second-to-last letter is essential for telling active from passive — review الفَتحة and الكَسرة before tackling Grammar Note 2.
The text is written in the same house style as the Pearson Sample Assessment Materials Text 2. Anonymous-byline modern MSA article, ~310 words, with embedded direct speech from two named people (a student and an expert). The two grammar notes target structures examiners flag every year: future tense (basic structure, currently uncovered in the reader and a Q11–14 staple) and active / passive participles (complex structure, examiner-flagged kasra-vs-fatḥa trap).
Lesson 8 (Topic 4, Culture) takes up the question of why reading still matters in the age of screens. Grammar focus moves to المَفعول لأجلِه (the noun-of-reason) and reinforces participles with stronger Form II–X examples.