How it works. Arabic builds the passive voice by changing the vowels of the verb. The active yuṭliqu (يُطلِقُ — "he gives / applies (a name)") becomes the passive yuṭlaqu (يُطلَقُ — "is given / is applied"). The doer disappears from the sentence, and the thing acted upon takes the role of subject. Arabic calls this new subject the nāʾib fāʿil ("deputy subject"), and it goes in the nominative case.
Another example in this passage:
Notice the typical vowel pattern in the present-tense passive: the first vowel becomes ḍamma (ـُ), the middle vowel becomes fatḥa (ـَ). For the past tense the pattern is even clearer: active kataba (he wrote) → passive kutiba (it was written).
Why writers use it. Two reasons that matter for analysis:
How it works. Arabic has two ways to negate a past action:
The trick is the verb form. Even though the meaning is past, the verb you put after lam looks like the present (yafʿalu family) — but with its ending shortened. This shortened ending is called the jussive (al-majzūm).
What the jussive looks like:
Two more examples in this passage:
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
تُؤَكِّدُ الدِّراساتُ الحَديثَةُ — كَما يَذكُرُ النَّصُّ — أنَّ نَحوَ سَبعينَ بِالمِئَةِ من قَراراتِ المُراهِقِ اليَومِيَّةِ تَتَأَثَّرُ تَأثُّرًا مُباشِرًا بِآراءِ أصدِقائِهِ، سَواءٌ في اختِيارِ المَلابِسِ، أو في نَوعِ المُوسيقى، أو في المِهنَةِ الَّتي يَحلُمُ بِها. ويُشيرُ الكاتِبُ إلى أنَّ عِلمَ النَّفسِ لم يَصِل بَعدُ إلى تَفسيرٍ كامِلٍ لِهذِهِ الظّاهِرَةِ، رَغمَ كَثرَةِ ما كُتِبَ عَنها.
الشَّواهد: الأَسطُر ٢–٥
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
الفَوائِدُ:
الأُولى: أنَّ الصَّديقَ يَفهَمُ صاحِبَهُ في وَقتِ الحُزنِ، حتى لَيُخَفِّفَ عنه ثِقَلَ ما يَحمِلُهُ في صَدرِهِ، كَما قالَت لينا: «حينَ أكونُ حَزينَةً، يَكفي أن أَتَّصِلَ بِإِحداهُنَّ فَأَشعُرَ أنَّ الحِملَ قد رُفِعَ عن صَدري». والثَّانِيَةُ: أنَّ الصُّحبَةَ الصّالِحَةَ تَزرَعُ في صاحِبِها فَضائِلَ كَثيرَةً كَاللُّطفِ والكَرَمِ وحُبِّ القِراءَةِ والإقدامِ على ما كانَ يَظُنُّهُ فَوقَ طاقَتِهِ.
المَشاكِل:
الأُولى: «ضَغطُ الأَقرانِ»، وهو المُصطَلَحُ الَّذي يُطلَقُ على التَّأثيرِ السَّلبيِّ الَّذي يَجُرُّ المُراهِقَ إلى التَّدخينِ والسَّهَرِ وإهمالِ الدِّراسَةِ، كَما حَذَّرَ الدُّكتورُ فَوزي. والثَّانِيَةُ: ضَياعُ الوَقتِ والجُهدِ في الصُّحبَةِ غَيرِ المُفيدَةِ، كَما اعتَرَفَت لينا حينَ قالَت: «الصَّديقَةُ قد تَكونُ أيضًا سَبَبًا لِخَسارَةِ المَرءِ أعَزَّ ما يَملِكُ من وَقتٍ وجُهدٍ».
الشَّواهد: الفَوائِدُ في السَّطرَينِ ٧ و ١٥ · المَشاكِلُ في السَّطرَينِ ١١ و ٨
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
قَصَدَ الدُّكتورُ فَوزي بِعِبارَةِ «ضَغطُ الأَقرانِ» ذلِكَ التَّأثيرَ الخَفِيَّ الَّذي يُمارِسُهُ الصَّديقُ على صاحِبِهِ دونَ أن يَشعُرَ أيُّهُما بِذلِكَ، فَيَدفَعُهُ إلى تَجرِبَةِ ما لم يَكُن لِيُجَرِّبَهُ لَو كانَ وَحدَهُ. ولِذلِكَ ضَرَبَ مَثَلًا بِجُملَةٍ صَغيرَةٍ يَقولُها صَديقٌ لِصَديقِهِ — «لِمَ لا تُجَرِّبُ؟ لَقد جَرَّبنا كُلُّنا» — لِيُبَيِّنَ كَيفَ يَبدَأُ التَّدخينُ والسَّهَرُ وإهمالُ الدِّراسَةِ بِكَلِمَةٍ واحِدَةٍ يَعجَزُ المُراهِقُ عن رَفضِها.
الشَّواهد: السَّطران ١٠–١٢
الإجابَة النَّموذَجِيَّة
يَطرَحُ الكاتِبُ في خاتِمَةِ النَّصِّ سُؤالًا واحِدًا حاسِمًا: لَيسَ «هل أتَأَثَّرُ بِأَصدِقائي؟» — لِأنَّ التَّأثُّرَ، في رَأيِهِ، أمرٌ لا مَفَرَّ منه — بَل «مَن أَختارُ أَصدِقاءَ؟». ويُجيبُ بِأنَّ الاختِيارَ الذَّكِيَّ لِلرُّفقَةِ هو نِصفُ الطَّريقِ إلى النَّجاحِ، ويَستَشهِدُ بِقَولِ الإمامِ عَلِيٍّ — رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنه — «الصّاحِبُ ساحِبٌ»، أي أنَّ الصَّديقَ يَجُرُّ صاحِبَهُ — بِغَيرِ شُعورٍ — إلى ما هو عَلَيه، خَيرًا كانَ أم شَرًّا.
الشَّواهد: السَّطران ١٦–١٧ (الخاتِمَة)
Two voices in the article. The writer doesn't just give his own opinion. He lets two people speak inside the article: Lina, a tenth-grade student, in the second paragraph; and Dr Fawzi, a social researcher, in the third. Both voices appear in direct speech, between «…» marks.
Pick the two quoted voices (Lina's and Dr Fawzi's). What does each voice add to the article? Why do you think the writer used real people's voices, instead of just giving us his own opinion or a list of facts?
The best answers don't just say "the writer uses quotes". They explain what the two voices do in the article:
This kind of question appears as Paper 1 Questions 4 & 8 in the GCSE — worth 10 marks each (20 of the 49 reading marks). Spotting embedded voices and explaining their effect is a textbook top-band move.
The writer ends with the wisdom-saying of Imām ʿAlī: «الصاحب ساحب» — "the companion is one who pulls" (i.e. a friend drags you, without you noticing, towards what they themselves are).
Do you think this old saying is still true today? Think of a time when a friend pulled you towards something good, or towards something you later regretted. How would you describe what happened?
Try writing two short Arabic sentences in answer: one starting with قد ساعَدَني صَديقي (a friend of mine helped me…), one starting with لم أَكُن لِأَفعَلَ هذا لَولا (I would not have done this if not for…). Notice that the second uses lam + jussive — see the grammar note above.
35–50 minutes for a self-study learner. Can be split into two sessions (read text + vocab + translation in session 1; grammar + questions + craft in session 2).
The learner should already know: the nominal sentence (al-jumla al-ismiyya), the verbal sentence (al-jumla al-fiʿliyya), past and present tense forms, and the basic difference between nominative, accusative, and genitive. Knowing the family of kāna (with aṣbaḥa, laysa, etc.) helps — they appear in lines 1, 9 and 15.
This text is written in the same house style as the Pearson Sample Assessment Materials Text 2. Anonymous-byline modern MSA article, ~285 words, with embedded direct speech from two named people (a student and an expert). If the learner can read this lesson confidently, they can read any of the SAM or past-paper Text 2 passages on Topic 1 (Youth Matters).
Grammar notes target two of the structures examiners flag every year: the passive voice (nāʾib fāʿil, complex structure, weak area) and lam + jussive (basic structure, frequently tested in Q11–14 grammar). Both appear at least twice in the passage so the learner can spot them in context.
Lesson 2 (also Topic 1, Youth Matters) takes a youth ambitions angle — the choices young people make about their future — and shifts the grammar focus to the cognate accusative (al-mafʿūl al-muṭlaq) and the conditional in + jussive.